Warming up your knowledge graph
Your knowledge graph starts cold. That’s not a flaw — it’s the honest starting point of any context system that refuses to guess. Warming it up is a sequence of phases, most automated, a few deliberately human.
The phases
Section titled “The phases”| Phase | What happens | Automated, or you? |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Harvest | Agents pull schemas, lineage, query history, and dbt metadata from your connected systems into the graph, every fact stamped with its source. | Automated, once systems are connected and verified |
| 2 · Reconcile | The same table seen through Snowflake, dbt, and your catalog is merged into one entity; conflicts are surfaced, not silently resolved. | Automated, with conflicts queued for you |
| 3 · Enrich | Agents propose descriptions, ownership guesses, and quality annotations — as proposals, with confidence attached. | Automated proposals |
| 4 · Curate | Your team reviews proposals and adds what no system contains: business definitions, the “revenue means ARR for finance” rules, the no-touch lists. | You — this is the part only your team knows |
| 5 · Promote | Facts your team stands behind are promoted to authoritative — each promotion approved by a named human. | You, with the gate enforced by the platform |
After warm-up, governed agent write-back keeps the graph improving with use — and the self-maintaining refresh loop, once enabled for your deployment, re-harvests on a standing schedule (see the note on the Context Wizard page).
A practical warm-up plan
Section titled “A practical warm-up plan”- Pick one schema that matters.
analyticsbeatseverything— a scoped harvest completes fast and is checkable by a human who knows the data. - Run the harvest (Scale: from the Context Wizard surface; Start: agents harvest as they work). Spot-check: do the entity counts look like your estate? If something looks missing, say so — don’t promote around a gap.
- Clear the reconcile queue. Every merge conflict you resolve teaches the graph your naming reality.
- Curate the twenty facts that matter most. The top tables’ real definitions and owners deliver more agent-answer quality than a thousand auto-descriptions.
- Promote deliberately. Authoritative facts are the ones agents will state without hedging — promote what you’d defend in a meeting.
- Expand scope one schema at a time, repeating 2–5.
How you know it’s working
Section titled “How you know it’s working”Ask an agent a question whose answer lives in the graph — “Who owns fct_orders and what
does net_revenue actually mean here?” A warm graph answers with provenance; a cold one
says it doesn’t know yet. Both are correct behavior — the difference is warmth, and the
fix is the next phase of this page, not a workaround.